Pollutants in buildings: it's not to be trifled with

Hindsight is always wiser - this saying also applies to some building materials that were very popular in the past - when people didn't know any better - but are now considered pollutants. The list of such materials includes some that are currently still installed in many older residential buildings. "As a rule of thumb, one can assume [...]

Renovation of old buildings
Renovating old buildings: Old cement adhesives, floor coverings, plasters and the like can contain problematic pollutants. (Image: Dirk (Beeki®) Schumacher / Pixabay.com)

Hindsight is always wiser - this saying also applies to some building materials that were very popular in the past - when people didn't know any better - but are now considered pollutants. The list of such materials includes some that are currently still installed in many older residential buildings. "As a rule of thumb, we can assume that delicate pollutants can be found in a good half of the buildings built before 1990," says Roger Achermann, owner of Achermann Bau und Sanierung AG in Winterthur. The company has been active in pollutant remediation since 1985. The year 1990 is considered the limit with regard to building pollutants, because from that point on the use of the particularly dangerous asbestos was banned in this country. In addition to asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are also among the sensitive materials that have been used in residential buildings. PCBs are found, for example, in joint sealants on facades, in paints for basement floors, and in fireproof painted surfaces. PAHs, on the other hand, are found in tar-containing products - for example, in old roofing felt or tar coatings for cork insulation in the window area. Asbestos is found, for example, in roofing and siding shingles, as a component of piping or in plasters, cement adhesives for ceramic tiles, electrical panels and on the underside of plastic flooring. "In fact, you can come across asbestos anywhere in a house," says expert Achermann. All three pollutants have one thing in common: As long as the materials in which they are contained are not worked on or damaged, they generally do not release any harmful substances.

Testing before purchase

However, they become an issue during renovation and conversion work. And you should also pay attention to this when buying a house that is more than thirty years old: Anyone who buys an old building usually plans to make changes to it. If you come across harmful substances in the process, it can quickly add up. "Professional asbestos removal of up to ten square meters of tiling in a bathroom, for example, can quickly cost between CHF 3,000 and CHF 5,000," says Roger Achermann. Costs that a new homeowner then has to pay in addition to the renovation. "When we advise clients before they buy an old building, we always recommend having a professional building pollutant analysis carried out," says Veronika Harder, building consultant from Zurich/Eglisau and board member of the Chamber of Independent Building Consultants. Depending on the number of samples that need to be taken, this can quickly cost between a hundred and a thousand francs, but it creates budget security and may have another advantage: if there are only a few interested parties for the property, the expected costs for the pollutant remediation can also be included in the purchase price negotiations.

Pollutants: testing before renovation

Anyone who owns a property built before 1990 may also be affected by pollutants. If conversion or renovation work is planned, a pollutant check is also a must. If you are unsure about the pollutants, you are gambling with the health of all the residents and that of the workmen, because released pollutants such as asbestos fibers are easily inhaled and can be distributed in all rooms. If a building permit is required for a remodeling project, the authorities also stipulate that the pollutants must be tested. If the construction work is carried out by professionals, they usually require preliminary clarifications for the relevant properties anyway, regardless of official requirements. "Reputable companies do not carry out work on old buildings without being sure that all pollutants have been removed. This is because contractors bear responsibility for the health of their employees and can also be sanctioned by SUVA in the event of violations," says pollutant remediator Roger Achermann. A specialist is not always needed to search for the pollutants. If, for example, you only want to tear out an old plastic floor covering, you can do the sampling yourself using special sampling kits that are available on the Internet. And the costs for professional removal do not always have to be so high, as in the example of the bathroom mentioned above. Components containing harmful substances that are only fastened with screws, for example, can often simply be removed by a craftsman with appropriate care and disposed of in accordance with the applicable guidelines. How to handle which material has also been defined by SUVA in instruction sheets, which craftsmen use as a guide. And even if the results of the investigation mean that more extensive remediation by specialists is necessary, it is worth the price several times over - because ultimately it is a question of the health of everyone involved.

More information

Information on the subject of asbestos at the Federal Office of Public Health: www.abestinfo.ch

Advice on all aspects of real estate construction: Chamber of Independent Building Consultants www.kub.ch

This article originally appeared on m-q.ch - https://www.m-q.ch/de/schadstoffe-in-gebaeuden-damit-ist-nicht-zu-spassen/

More articles on the topic